Search Completed | Title | Safety of Grid Scale Lithium-ion Battery Energy Storage Systems
Original File Name Searched: EN010106-004026-DL2-Li-ion-BESS-safety-concerns_Redacted.pdf | Google It | Yahoo | Bing

Page | 028 – 27 – June 5, 2021 substances in the hazard categories H1 and H2 (Acute Toxic) and P2 (Flammable Gases) are foreseeable in the event of thermal runaway accidents. One of the Flammable Gases is Hydrogen, which is a “Named Dangerous Substance” in Part 2 of Schedule 1 of the COMAH Regulations 2015. Lower thresholds are specified for Hydrogen than for other P2 Inflammable Gases. It remains therefore to consider the quantities of dangerous substances which could be generated if “control of the process is lost” in a thermal runaway incident. Published literature sources quantify evolution of flammable gases from tests of various Li-ion cells in sealed vessels. Open “fire tests” quantify the evolution of toxic gases particularly Hydrogen Fluoride. Many other test results exist in the records of specialist test laboratories, but here we rely upon two primary published sources. Golubkov et al. (2014) [13] report quantities of evolved inflammables from Li-ion cells of three different electrode chemistries in thermal runaway situations. The proportion of Hydrogen (H2), Methane (CH4), Ethylene (C2H4) and Carbon Monoxide (CO) does not in fact vary greatly between different types of Li-ion cell, reflecting an underlying inventory of hydro-carbon material (plastics, electrolyte solvents etc) that remain similar in all Li-ion technologies. This is consistent with DNV/GL test data cited in the Hill/DNV report [8]. The quantitative estimates here are taken from results derived from cells with Nickel-Manganese-Cobalt (NMC) electrodes, as used in the McMicken BESS. It was not possible in the apparatus of Golubkov et al. to determine the concentrations of HF evolved. Larsson et al. [11] report evolved quantities of Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) from Li-ion cells in open “fire tests”, and also the Total Heat Released (THR) from combustion of the inflammables. Again these vary between cell technologies and “form factors”, especially whether the cells have an outer metal cannister or are in the “pouch” format. Quantities between 20 – 200 mg / Wh are reported. The worst case figure is used in the following estimates; the lowest evolution reported for “pouch” cells was 43 mg/Wh. Both sources report evolved gas quantities on a per Wh basis. We scale these to a Li-ion BESS cell size on the basis of stored energy since this will be roughly proportional to the electrolyte solvents and other polymer materials in the cell. Scaling on a per mass basis would be preferable, but this would require further information on the exact composition of the cells in the literature tests, and indeed those for the BESS in question. During the McMicken investigation, the cell manufacturers refused to release such data. H1 and H2 Acute Toxics. The applicability of COMAH is easiest to determine in respect of Hydrogen Fluoride (HF). This has a dual hazard classification [12] as H1 Acute Toxic (skin exposure) and H2 Acute Toxic (inhalation) and both exposure routes would apply to the general public nearby. The lower tier COMAH threshold for H1 Acute Toxics is 5 tonnes [27]; using the upper estimate of 200 mg/Wh from Larsson, the BESS capacity at which a BESS enters the scope of COMAH (lower tier) is 25 MWh. This is far below the projected storage capacities given in Table 3 (Appendix 1). With high storage capacity cabins (of e.g. 12.5 MWh), it would require propagation of a fire from just one cabin to a second, to generate HF above the COMAH threshold. It is not necessary to foresee a major conflagration involving multiple cabin-to-cabin propagation to bring the establishment within scope of COMAH; just two cabins would suffice. If 25 MWh were stored in a single large cabin, the question of cabin-to-cabin propagation is irrelevant.
|